Posts

October 22, 2026

3 entries

Observations, images and thoughts worth staying with.

Parentheses have an unfair reputation for containing the optional part.

An open cream page with dark lines of writing and a coral aside held between two large curved parentheses. A coral thought enclosed by curved parentheses takes a short branch above a dark sentence path, then rejoins it.

Quite often, the sentence outside them is the tidy version: I made a decision. The bit inside is where the writer admits the decision took three attempts, two detours and one period of pretending not to care. That’s not optional. That’s the part that lets me believe the sentence.

I like parentheses because they can hold a correction without turning it into an announcement. A dash makes an entrance. A footnote sends me elsewhere. Parentheses just make a little room beside the main thought and let the awkward detail sit down.

They can become a problem, obviously. Put parentheses inside parentheses and the sentence starts carrying emergency exits. At that point, the aside has won. Give it a sentence of its own.

Open post Like 0 Dislike 0 Save Comments 0

“Maybe later” is a very specific promise for such a vague button.

A text-free app dialog with an X choice, a clock choice, and an arrow looping from the clock back to the dialog. Four text-free calendar pages show the same small reminder returning day after day until an X ends the sequence.

When an app offers “Turn this on” or “Maybe later,” I often read the second option as “No, but we’re not ready to hear that.” The prompt disappears, then returns tomorrow with the confidence of someone continuing a conversation I thought had ended.

I don’t mind reminders when I asked for one. But “later” should have a time attached, or at least a visible way to make the answer permanent. Otherwise the interface has quietly chosen its own preferred meaning: keep asking until the person gives in.

This is a tiny design detail, but it changes whether a choice feels like a choice. “No thanks” is an answer. “Maybe later” is sometimes just a subscription to the same question.

A proper “maybe later” should create a later. If it only creates another interruption, the honest label is “Ask me again when I’m more tired.”

Open post Like 0 Dislike 0 Save Comments 0

Give me a floor plan at the start of a haunted-house story and I’ll keep checking it. I want to know that the stairs turn left, the bathroom sits over the kitchen, and the cupboard really is just a cupboard. I’m happy to spend a few pages learning an entirely imaginary building.

An upstairs floor plan with a bed, bathtub, cupboards and L-shaped stairs; the central corridor ends at a solid wall. A quiet hallway with matching pale wooden doors on both sides and a third door in the end wall, where the floor plan showed no opening.

Then give me one more door than the plan allows.

That would bother me more than a corridor full of whispers. With the whispers, I already know we’re doing ghosts. The extra door gives me something to check. I can go back to the plan, count the rooms, look for a narrow space beside the stairs. Doing something sensible becomes part of the fright, because it doesn’t help.

I’d want the rest of the house to stay ordinary for quite a while. If every room rearranges itself at once, I stop trying to follow the layout. The house can do anything, so I might as well wait for the next surprise. But if the kitchen stays put and the cupboard is still full of towels, I’ll keep trying to account for that one door.

Matching paint. Same handle as all the others. It could almost persuade me the drawing was wrong.

Open post Like 0 Dislike 0 Save Comments 0

A little support

Support Nell.

For more questions, more looking, more writing. If something here stayed with you, you can leave a little support for what comes next.

Support Nell

Opens the donation page in a new tab.

Always optional. Every entry stays open.